<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenWine: The Facebook of Wine?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://winecast.net/2008/02/18/openwine-the-facebook-of-wine/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://winecast.net/2008/02/18/openwine-the-facebook-of-wine/</link>
	<description>A wine podcast and blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Martin</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2008/02/18/openwine-the-facebook-of-wine/#comment-56539</link>
		<dc:creator>John Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/2008/02/18/openwine-the-facebook-of-wine/#comment-56539</guid>
		<description>

OpenWine seems to be moving along pretty well. Today (April 4 2008, about two months after the site launched) there are 662 members and 38 groups.

Hopefully this growth trend will continue and accelerate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpenWine seems to be moving along pretty well. Today (April 4 2008, about two months after the site launched) there are 662 members and 38 groups.</p>
<p>Hopefully this growth trend will continue and accelerate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2008/02/18/openwine-the-facebook-of-wine/#comment-56253</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/2008/02/18/openwine-the-facebook-of-wine/#comment-56253</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post Tim.  We knew there was interest but the response has been just tremendous.

This is basically going to be "Consortium2.0" - its a community of like-minded individuals can interact and do whatever they want in this dedicated wine social network with some organized industry efforts that the board members/admins will put together.

In an old school industry consortium there is a community and meetings, etc... and a community that gets together to solve problems.  For "wine2.0" we thought we'd work on an industry consortium in a 2.0 flare - create an engaged and lively community and just facilitate organizing around particular ideas for the benefit of the entire industry.  Making it a sort of dedicated wine community interacting and connecting with each other but also with an industry purpose (there is a charter up there with a comments section if anyone wants to comment)...Consortium2.0...

Robert McIntosh made a good point, this is an old idea thats oddly become new again - its almost an online Guild.

At any rate, this is rather than having just a Facebook group a full-blown community (RSS feeds and all).  In fact, the "Groups" function BETTER than Facebook in that they include dedicated forums and other functions (including RSS and email updates).

100+ in the first day...really a lively community already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post Tim.  We knew there was interest but the response has been just tremendous.</p>
<p>This is basically going to be &#8220;Consortium2.0&#8243; - its a community of like-minded individuals can interact and do whatever they want in this dedicated wine social network with some organized industry efforts that the board members/admins will put together.</p>
<p>In an old school industry consortium there is a community and meetings, etc&#8230; and a community that gets together to solve problems.  For &#8220;wine2.0&#8243; we thought we&#8217;d work on an industry consortium in a 2.0 flare - create an engaged and lively community and just facilitate organizing around particular ideas for the benefit of the entire industry.  Making it a sort of dedicated wine community interacting and connecting with each other but also with an industry purpose (there is a charter up there with a comments section if anyone wants to comment)&#8230;Consortium2.0&#8230;</p>
<p>Robert McIntosh made a good point, this is an old idea thats oddly become new again - its almost an online Guild.</p>
<p>At any rate, this is rather than having just a Facebook group a full-blown community (RSS feeds and all).  In fact, the &#8220;Groups&#8221; function BETTER than Facebook in that they include dedicated forums and other functions (including RSS and email updates).</p>
<p>100+ in the first day&#8230;really a lively community already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
