<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charles F. Shaw Winery, Chardonnay 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/</link>
	<description>A wine podcast and blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-54833</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/#comment-54833</guid>
		<description>Charles Shaw wine has become an institution in Arizona and California.  Not just because of the low price, but because of the pleasing taste and aroma of pepper and berries.  It has become very popular with the older adults who like to have parties.  No one seems to turn down a glass of Charles Shaw.  Some don't even know what the label is and they always ask for more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles Shaw wine has become an institution in Arizona and California.  Not just because of the low price, but because of the pleasing taste and aroma of pepper and berries.  It has become very popular with the older adults who like to have parties.  No one seems to turn down a glass of Charles Shaw.  Some don&#8217;t even know what the label is and they always ask for more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-54675</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/#comment-54675</guid>
		<description>Tim, 

You might actually try the 2006 Two-Buck-Chuck Chard and see how close to the 92-94 point score you come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, </p>
<p>You might actually try the 2006 Two-Buck-Chuck Chard and see how close to the 92-94 point score you come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-53467</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/#comment-53467</guid>
		<description>Not to worry, nearly everyone else thought this was legit, as well. 

In retrospect, I could have just written a straight post about Alder joining the Wine Spectator but he posted while I was in the middle of cooking up my false tasting note... I'll try harder next year ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to worry, nearly everyone else thought this was legit, as well. </p>
<p>In retrospect, I could have just written a straight post about Alder joining the Wine Spectator but he posted while I was in the middle of cooking up my false tasting note&#8230; I&#8217;ll try harder next year <img src='http://winecast.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonadora</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-53466</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonadora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/#comment-53466</guid>
		<description>Ah, missed the joke.  A little slow on the uptake first thing in the morning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, missed the joke.  A little slow on the uptake first thing in the morning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-53458</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/#comment-53458</guid>
		<description>Sonadora,

Happy April ;-)

I took the seeds of truth and took it into absurd but still somewhat believable territory for my April Fools joke. Not too many people got it, however. Oh well, there's always next year.

The best &lt;a href="http://www.vinography.com/archives/2007/04/a_special_announcement_from_vi.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;wine blogger April Fools post&lt;/a&gt; was from Alder, as usual...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonadora,</p>
<p>Happy April <img src='http://winecast.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I took the seeds of truth and took it into absurd but still somewhat believable territory for my April Fools joke. Not too many people got it, however. Oh well, there&#8217;s always next year.</p>
<p>The best <a href="http://www.vinography.com/archives/2007/04/a_special_announcement_from_vi.html" rel="nofollow">wine blogger April Fools post</a> was from Alder, as usual&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonadora</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-53456</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonadora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/#comment-53456</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  I must admit when I first saw your title I thought you were going to review a bottle of $2 Chuck.  Though I doubt any of the consumers of the new Charles Shaw wines will confuse it with a bottle of the $2 kind....the price alone should be enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I must admit when I first saw your title I thought you were going to review a bottle of $2 Chuck.  Though I doubt any of the consumers of the new Charles Shaw wines will confuse it with a bottle of the $2 kind&#8230;.the price alone should be enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
