<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Winecast 63 - Live Austrian Wine Adventure 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://winecast.net/2006/06/06/winecast-63-live-austrian-wine-adventure-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://winecast.net/2006/06/06/winecast-63-live-austrian-wine-adventure-2/</link>
	<description>A wine podcast and blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Williams</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2006/06/06/winecast-63-live-austrian-wine-adventure-2/#comment-37870</link>
		<dc:creator>David Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/?p=388#comment-37870</guid>
		<description>It's worth noting that your 20 point scale is actually a 41 point scale (including zero and half points).    I think the advantage of a high number system, unlike 4 or 5 stars, is the ability to differeniate between the higher rated wines.  ie 8.5 for one wine but a 9 for another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that your 20 point scale is actually a 41 point scale (including zero and half points).    I think the advantage of a high number system, unlike 4 or 5 stars, is the ability to differeniate between the higher rated wines.  ie 8.5 for one wine but a 9 for another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
