<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Winecast 31 &#8211; Napa Valley Zin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://winecast.net/2005/07/15/winecast-31-napa-valley-zin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://winecast.net/2005/07/15/winecast-31-napa-valley-zin/</link>
	<description>A wine podcast and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:10:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Winecast - A wine blog and podcast</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2005/07/15/winecast-31-napa-valley-zin/comment-page-1/#comment-47761</link>
		<dc:creator>Winecast - A wine blog and podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/?p=159#comment-47761</guid>
		<description>[...] The pumpkin pie is made and the turkey is in the oven (all 22.5 pounds of it!) and I&#8217;m making the final wine selections. Out of a couple of Bordeaux (ChÃƒÂ¢teau Camensac &#8216;95 &amp; Chateau Clos Rene &#8216;00), an aged Napa Merlot (Trinchero &#8220;Chicken Ranch&#8221; &#8216;99) or Napa Zinfandel (Neal Family &#8216;03) I&#8217;ve selected the Zin. This is the same wine I reviewed on Winecast 31 but I&#8217;ll post fresh notes later in the day. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The pumpkin pie is made and the turkey is in the oven (all 22.5 pounds of it!) and I&#8217;m making the final wine selections. Out of a couple of Bordeaux (ChÃƒÂ¢teau Camensac &#8216;95 &#38; Chateau Clos Rene &#8216;00), an aged Napa Merlot (Trinchero &#8220;Chicken Ranch&#8221; &#8216;99) or Napa Zinfandel (Neal Family &#8216;03) I&#8217;ve selected the Zin. This is the same wine I reviewed on Winecast 31 but I&#8217;ll post fresh notes later in the day. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winecast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ravenswood, Zinfandel, Napa Valley 2002</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2005/07/15/winecast-31-napa-valley-zin/comment-page-1/#comment-19450</link>
		<dc:creator>Winecast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ravenswood, Zinfandel, Napa Valley 2002</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/?p=159#comment-19450</guid>
		<description>[...] Ravenswood, Zinfandel, Napa Valley 2002 ($12) - As I have noted on my podcast, I always considered Napa Valley Zin&#8217;s as being more &#8220;Cab-like&#8221; and not one to get down and dirty like Sonoma or Sierra Foothills bottlings. I found this one on sale, so I picked it up earlier in the week to give it a try. Like it&#8217;s cousins from other appellations, it&#8217; a bruiser with 14.5% alcohol. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ravenswood, Zinfandel, Napa Valley 2002 ($12) &#8211; As I have noted on my podcast, I always considered Napa Valley Zin&#8217;s as being more &#8220;Cab-like&#8221; and not one to get down and dirty like Sonoma or Sierra Foothills bottlings. I found this one on sale, so I picked it up earlier in the week to give it a try. Like it&#8217;s cousins from other appellations, it&#8217; a bruiser with 14.5% alcohol. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winecast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Poll Results</title>
		<link>http://winecast.net/2005/07/15/winecast-31-napa-valley-zin/comment-page-1/#comment-11614</link>
		<dc:creator>Winecast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Poll Results</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 23:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winecast.net/?p=159#comment-11614</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to the more than 150 listeners who weighed in on my request for their preferred form of underwriting for Winecast. For new listeners, the growth of the show has increased my hosting costs noticeably, as I explained in Winecast 31 and when I announced this poll here on the blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to the more than 150 listeners who weighed in on my request for their preferred form of underwriting for Winecast. For new listeners, the growth of the show has increased my hosting costs noticeably, as I explained in Winecast 31 and when I announced this poll here on the blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
